Archive for October, 2013

What is the exact measure of what makes us human? What is the primary feeling that separates us from irrational beings? It is our unique ability of solidarity and indignation in the face of misery and pain of others? The pictures below were taken from research through compilation of reports and lists published by newspapers, magazines, websites specializing in photography, photojournalism and history.

The research aimed to identify what were the saddest photos of all time. Participated in the survey the publications: Life, The Guardian, Der Spiegel, Telegraph, El Universal, The Pulitzer Prizes, Day Life, World’s Famous Photos, Digital History, Listverse, Newspapers Option, Al Fotto, National Geographic and World Press Photo. Obviously lists are always incomplete. It is known that, like the perception, the subjective – that was the basis of the research – is an individual thing.

However, the pictures selected, if not unanimity among journalists and photographers (and possibly will not be among the readers) are undeniable references to some of the cruelest moments of history. Here are in classification order, the 20 saddest pictures selected based on these publications.

Omayra Sanchez (1985)

Omayra Sanchez (1985)

The photograph shows Omayra Sanchez, a 13-year-old girl who was trapped in construction waste after a landslide caused by the eruption of the volcano Nevado del Ruiz, which devastated the village of Armero, Colombia, in 1985. Rescuers were unable to rescue her. She died about 60 hours after being trapped. The photo won the World Press Photo 1985. Photographer: Frank Fournier.

The Nigerian-Biafran War (1969)

Biafra (1969)

Biafra, officially the Republic of Biafra, was a secessionist state in south-eastern Nigeria that existed from 30 May 1967 to 15 January 1970, taking its name from the Bight of Biafra (the Atlantic bay to its south). The Nigerian Civil War or the Nigerian-Biafran War killed more than a million people between 1967 and 1970, mainly from starvation. Thousands of children were affected of Kwashiorkor, pathology resulting from insufficient protein intake. The war photographer Don McCullin was the first to draw attention to the tragedy. Photographer: Don McCullin.

Phan Thi Kim Phúc (1972)

Phan Thi Kim Phúc (1972)

Winner of the Pulitzer Prize in 1973 and the most famous war photograph of all time. Kim Phuc (the girl naked, also known as the girl in the picture) runs along a road near Trang Bang, South Vietnam, after an aerial napalm attack. To survive, Kim ripped her clothes in flames of her body. Photographer: Nick Ut.

Execution of a Viet Cong Guerrilla (1968)

Execution of a Viet Cong Guerrilla (1968)

Winner of the Pulitzer Prize, the picture shows Nguyen Ngoc Loan, chief of the South Vietnamese police, firing his pistol into the head of Nguyen Van Lem, official Vietcong in Saigon. Although shocking, the picture does not tell the whole story. The murdered man had killed a family. Photographer: Eddie Adamst.

The Famine in Sudan (1993)

The Famine in Sudão (1993)

Photo published in March 1993 in the “New York Times” and responsible for the rise of Kevin Carter as a photographer. In 1994, Kevin won the Pulitzer Prize for Photography. Although the picture is impressive, the vulture was not as close of the boy as the picture suggests – a fact that continues to cause controversy among journalists and photographers. The boy in the photo was called Nyong Kong and survived the vulture, died in 2007. Kevin Carter, the photographer, was killed in 1994. Photographer: Kevin Carter.

Hiroshima (1945)

Hiroshima (1945)

The photograph shows the first atomic bombing in history. On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima was devastated by atomic fission bomb called Little Boy, launched by the United States, resulting in 258,000 deaths and injuries. Photographer: George William Marquardt (the airplane pilot).

Racism in the United States (1950)

Racism in the United States (1950)

The photograph, which caused outrage around the world, shows separate drinking fountains for whites and blacks in North Carolina, United States. Until the 1950s, the african-Americans were not entitled to vote, were segregated socially and comprised the poorest segment of the U.S. population. Photographer: Elliott Erwitt.

The Power of One (2006)

The Power of One (2006)

In 2006, Israeli authorities ordered the evacuation of illegal outposts, such as Amona. Oded Balilty, an Israeli photographer for the Associated Press, was present when the evacuation degenerated into violent and unprecedented clashes between settlers and police officers. The picture shows a brave woman rebelling against authorities. Ynet Nili is the 16-year-old Jewish settler from the above picture. According to Ynet, “a picture like this one is a mark of disgrace for the state of Israel and is nothing to be proud of. The picture looks like it represents a work of art, but that isn’t what went on there. What happened in Amona was totally different.” Nili claims the police beat her up very harshly. “You see me in the photograph, one against many, but that is only an illusion – behind the many stands one man – (Prime Minister Ehud) Olmert, but behind me stand the Lord and the people of Israel.” Photographer: Oded Balilty.

Uganda (1980)

Uganda (1980)

Photography done by Mike Wells, in April 1980, shows a child in the province of Karamoja, Uganda, holding hands with a missionary. The contrast between the two hands serves as a reminder of the chasm that separates developed and underdeveloped countries. The photograph remained unpublished for years. Photographer: Mike Wells.

The Falling Man (2001)

The Falling Man (2001)

Photograph taken by Richard Drew, Associated Press photographer, showing a man falling from the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Five years after the attacks, the man was identified as Jonathan Briley, a 43-year-old employee of a restaurant installed in in the North Tower of the World Trade Center. However, officially, his identity has never been confirmed. Photographer: Richard Drew.

Migrant Mother (1936)

Migrant Mother (1936)

An icon of the Great Depression and one of the most famous photos of the United States. Florence Owens Thompson, 32, devastated by not having enough food to feed her children. American journalists have spent decades trying to locate the mother and her seven children. In late 1970 she was found not prospered greatly. She lived in a trailer. Photographer: Dorothea Lange.

The Afghan Girl (1985)

The Afghan Girl (1985)

Sharbat Gula is an Afghan woman who was the subject of a famous photograph by journalist Steve McCurry. Gula was living as a refugee in Pakistan during the time of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan when she was photographed. The image brought her recognition when it was featured on the cover of the June 1985 issue of National Geographic Magazine at a time when she was approximately 12 years old. The identity of the Afghan Girl remained unknown for over 17 years. McCurry made several attempts during the 1990s to locate her, but was only in January 2002, that he finally found her. Photographer: Steve McCurry.

Kosovo Refugees (2000)

Kosovo Refugees (2000)

Carol Guzy, the first woman to receive a Pulitzer Prize for spot news photography, received her most recent Pulitzer in 2000 for her touching photographs of Kosovo refugees. The above picture portrays Agim Shala, a two-year-old boy, who is passed through a fence made with barbed wire to his family. Thousands of Kosovo refugees were reunited and camped in Kukes, Albania. Photographer: Carol Guzy.

War Underfoot (2004)

War Underfoot (2004)

Los Angeles Times photographer Carolyn Cole took this terrifying photo during her assignment in Liberia. It shows the devastating effects of the Liberian Civil War. Bullet casings cover entirely a street in Monrovia. The Liberian capital was the worst affected region, because it was the scene of heavy fighting between government soldiers and rebel forces. Carolyn won pulitzer prize in 2004 with the set of pictures containing this one. Photographer: Carolyn Cole.

Thailand Massacre (1976)

Thailand Massacre (1976)

Neal Ulevich won the 1977 Pulitzer Prize for a series of photographs of disorder and brutality in the streets of Bangkok, Thailand. The Thammasat University Massacre took place on October 6, 1976. It was a very violent attack on students who were demonstrating against Field Marshall Thanom Kittikachorn. Field Marshal T. Kittikachorn was a dictator who was planning to come back to Thailand. The return of the military dictator from exile provoked very violent protests. Protestors and students were beaten, mutilated, shot, hung and burnt to death. Photographer: Neal Ulevich.

After the Storm (2008)

After the Storm (2008)

Miami Herald photographer Patrick Farrell captured the harrowing images of the victims of Haiti in 2008. Farrell documented the Haitian tragedy with impressive black-and-white stills. The subject of “After the Storm” is a boy who is trying to save a stroller after the tropical storm Hanna struck Haiti. Photographer: Patrick Farrell.

After the Tsunami (2004)

After the Tsunami (2004)

One of the most representative and striking photos of the aftermath of the Indian Ocean tsunami was taken by Reuters photographer Arko Datta  in Tamil Nadu. He won the World Press Photo competition of 2004. Kathy Ryan, jury member and picture editor of  The New York Times Magazine, characterized Datta’s image as a “graphic, historical and starkly emotional picture.” After the Tsunami” illustrates an Indian woman lying on the sand with her arms outstretched, mourning a dead family member. Her relative was killed by one of the deadliest natural disasters that we have ever seen: the Indian Ocean tsunami. Photographer: Arko Datta.

Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1984)

Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1984)

Pablo Bartholomew is an acclaimed Indian photojournalist who captured the Bhopal Gas Tragedy into his lens. Almost 30 years have passed since India’s worst industrial catastrophe injured 558,125 people and killed as many as 15,000. Because safety standards and maintenance procedures had been ignored at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, a leak of methyl isocyanate  gas and other chemicals triggered a  massive environmental and human disaster. Photographer Pablo Bartholomew rushed to document the catastrophe. He came across a man who was burying a child. Photographer: Pablo Bartholomew.

Operation Lion Heart (2005)

Operation Lion Heart (2005)

Pulitzer Prize award winning photojournalist Deanne Fitzmaurice won the highly respected award in 2005 for the photographic essay “Operation Lion Heart”. Operation Lion Heart is the story of a 9-year-old Iraqi boy who was severely injured by an explosion during one of the most violent conflicts of modern history – the Iraq War. The boy was brought to a hospital in Oakland, CA where he had to undergo dozens of life-and-death surgeries. His courage and unwillingness to die gave him the nickname: Saleh Khalaf, “Lion Heart”. Photographer: Deanne Fitzmaurice.

The Syria Gas (2013)

Syria Gas (2013)

This citizen journalism image provided by the Local Committee of Arbeen which has been authenticated based on its contents and other AP reporting, shows Syrian citizens trying to identify dead bodies, after an alleged poisonous gas attack fired by regime forces, according to activists in Arbeen town, Damascus, Syria, on August 21, 2013. Syrian anti-government activists accused the regime of carrying out a toxic gas attack that killed at least 100 people, including many children as they slept, during intense artillery and rocket barrages on the eastern suburbs of Damascus, part of a fierce government offensive in the area. Photographer: AP Photo/Local Committee of Arbeen.

The purchase of Lucasfilm – say, the Star Wars franchise – by Disney begins to bear fruit beyond the expected. The promise of new movies, and the “discovery” of raw footage never seen before. Surely, there is much material to be mined in the basements of Lucasfilm which who knows why never before was included in previous saga editions on DVD and Blu-Ray.

No wonder the Empire lost to the rebel alliance — the storm troopers were so clumsy they fell all over each other. That’s one of many mistakes, falls, and general bumbling in a new Star Wars outtake reel, uploaded to YouTube Sunday. The video is a treat for fans of the film franchise, showing actors Harrison Ford, Alec Guinness and others breaking character after botched lines and missed cues.

The description accompanying the video reveals that the new footage comes from a recently re-released ebook, The Making of Star Wars (Enhanced Edition) by J.W Rinzler. Watch the video — which has no sound for the first 49 seconds — before YouTube remove it based on copyright rights:

Photographer captures each stage of her pregnancy in heartwarming series of snapshots

The Argentine photographer Sophie Starzenski had the idea to capture her pregnancy week by week to show the evolution of the growth of her belly. The result was a series of poetic self-portraits in the mirror made with just your camera as a companion, taking a picture at week 4, week 15, week 20, 25, 29, 33, 37, 40 and then finally with her two months son, Simon.

The snapshots were published in the facebook profile of the photographer and gradually gained more and more prominence. Given its great impact on social networks finally Sophie has decided to publish the photos on Behance’s website and show the whole world this beautiful series of self-portraits so special: “Proyecto Pyokko”.

SophieStarzenski1

SophieStarzenski2

SophieStarzenski3

SophieStarzenski4

SophieStarzenski5

SophieStarzenski6

SophieStarzenski7

SophieStarzenski8

SophieStarzenski9

SophieStarzenski10

Site: http://www.behance.net/gallery/Proyecto-Pyokko/11068993
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SophieStarzenski

stop

Recently, the invasion of the Institute Royal in São Paulo by activists opposed to the use of animals in scientific research raised the debate about animal rights in Brazil. Understand what happened.

Institute Royal and the animal rights

instituteInstitute Royal headquarters, in São Paulo, from where about 200 beagle dogs used in scientific research were rescued by activists.

StopAnimalCrueltyAt dawn on October 18, about 200 activists stormed the headquarters of the Institute Royal in São Roque, in São Paulo, to rescue beagles that were being used in scientific research, and several rabbits and mices. The planned invasion through social networks , followed closely by the police, reflected in public opinion by the most favorable possible way. Besides showing that social movements and activism promoted by groups like the Black Bloc and Anonymous – who not only participated in the rescue but supported the cause through their websites – has led the public to review some concepts about these groups , often accused being hooligans or vandals and criminalized by the official and manipulative media.

According to information released by the NGO “Compassion Information and Attitude Animal” after the arrival of a group of Black Blocs the gates were breached and the invasion occurred into the laboratories. Through social networks, the activists urged people to go to the place with cars to help in the rescue. According to the protesters, the animals were used for laboratory testing for cosmetic and pharmaceutical products and were subjected to mistreatment.

Given the impact of the case, even Globo TV – the most fascist arm that supports governments against popular demonstrations – changed the speech using the word “activists” all throughout the news showing the rescue of the animals. Although in practice the invasion was a crime, neither the police intervened nor the media criminalized the action. According to the protesters, at least 200 dogs were removed from the Institute and pages were created on Internet to campaigns for adoption. The police intervened only from the moment that activists most exalted began to vandalize the building, destroying equipment and research material.

See this video with the begin of the rescue:

.

freezerAccording to activists, mutilated animals were found dead and frozen.

dead-beagle-frozenPicture shows beagle frozen in nitrogen found by activists in the laboratory.

shaved-beagleThe dog with of the coat shaved and rescued of the laboratory could barely walk.

affectionSome of the rescued dogs receive the first affection that had in their lives even in the middle of the street.

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Throughout the day there were several waves of protests that continued for the next few days, as well as direct confrontations with the police. A police car and the car of the Globo TV team were torched. Several protesters were injured and some were arrested. A wave of indignation and anger among those who advocate ending the use of animals in scientific research has spread through social networks, causing immediate reaction from groups that defend this practice, and now increased the discussion about the use of animals in scientific research in Brazil.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Beagles are a breed standard for research around the world because they are friendly dogs and easy to handle. Many are created specifically for this. In the U.S., there is a protection group, the Beagle Freedom Project, which carries out rescues and fight to end the practice. On their website, there are several videos of releases. Startled, the animals take out the cages and understand that they are free.

TEXTO ORIGINAL:

Instituto Royal e o direito dos animais

Recentemente, a invasão do prédio do Instituto Royal em São Paulo por ativistas contrários ao uso de animais em pesquisas científicas levantou o debate sobre o direito dos animais no país.

Na madrugada de 18 de outubro, cerca de 200 ativistas invadiram a sede do Instituto Royal, em São Roque, no interior de São Paulo, para o resgate de cães da raça Beagle que estavam sendo usados em pesquisas científicas, além de diversos coelhos e ratos. A invasão planejada através das redes sociais, acompanhada de perto pela polícia, repercutiu na opinião pública da forma mais favorável possível. Além de mostrar que os movimentos sociais e o ativismo promovido por grupos como o Black Bloc e o Anonymous – que não só participaram do resgate como apoiaram a causa através de suas páginas na Internet – levou à opinião pública a rever alguns conceitos sobre esses grupos, frequentemente acusados de serem baderneiros ou vândalos e criminalizados pela mídia oficial e manipuladora.

Segundo informações divulgadas pela ONG “Compaixão  Informação e Atitude Animal”, após a chegada de um grupo de Black Blocs os portões foram arrombados e ocorreu a invasão dos laboratórios. Através das redes sociais, os ativistas pediram que as pessoas fossem ao local com carros para ajudar no resgate. Segundo os manifestantes, os animais eram usados para testes laboratoriais para produtos cosméticos e farmacêuticos e eram submetidos a maus tratos.

Diante da repercussão do caso, até mesmo a Rede Globo – o braço mais fascista a apoiar os governos contra as manifestações populares – mudou o discurso usando a palavra “ativistas” durante toda a reportagem que mostrou o resgate dos animais. Embora na prática a invasão tenha sido um crime, nem a polícia interviu nem a mídia criminalizou a ação. Segundo os manifestantes, ao menos 200 cães foram retirados do Instituto e páginas foram criadas na Internet para campanhas de adoção. A polícia interviu apenas a partir do momento em que “ativistas” mais exaltados começaram a depredar o prédio, destruindo equipamentos e material de pesquisa.

Ao longo do dia houve diversas ondas de protestos que se seguiram pelos dias seguintes, além de confrontos diretos com a polícia. Uma onda de indignação e revolta entre os que defendem o fim do uso de animais em pesquisas científicas se espalhou pelas redes sociais, provocando a reação imediata de grupos que defendem essa prática, e incendiou a discussão sobre o uso de animais em pesquisas científicas no Brasil.

Entenda a Lei 9.605 que pune maus-tratos a animais

luiza-mell-instagram

luiza-mell-1Uma das primeiras ativistas a serem identificadas pela Polícia Civil na invasão ao Instituto Royal, a apresentadora de TV Luisa Mell diz ter experimentado o “pior momento” de sua vida nas horas anteriores ao resgate dos cães da raça beagle, diante de rumores de que os animais seriam sacrificados. Após levar uma fêmea para casa, a apresentadora afirma que os cães utilizados em pesquisas no instituto apresentam diversos distúrbios de personalidade. “O que mais me choca é a maldade humana. É horrível ver a apatia desses animais. Sou uma pessoa que resgata animais toda a semana, tenho experiência nisso, e nunca tinha visto animais tão apáticos”, dispara a apresentadora, cuja carreira é voltada para a defesa dos direitos dos animais. Saiba mais no site da Luisa Mell.

A lei brasileira permite o uso de animais em pesquisas científicas, mas pune os maus-tratos com base no artigo 32 da Lei de Crimes Ambientais (Lei 9.605, de 1998), que determina que é crime “praticar ato de abuso, maus-tratos, ferir ou mutilar animais silvestres, domésticos ou domesticados, nativos ou exóticos”. Quem incorrer nas práticas estará sujeito a pena de detenção de três meses a um ano, além de multa. Se o animal morrer em decorrência do crime, a pena é aumentada de um sexto a um terço. A lei prevê a mesma punição para quem realizar “experiência dolorosa ou cruel com animal vivo, ainda que para fins didáticos ou científicos, quando existirem recursos alternativos”.

Como a maioria das leis brasileiras, a Lei 9.605 deixa brechas a especulações e saídas jurídicas que certamente livrarão das grades os responsáveis pelo Instituto Royal. O ponto polêmico é concluir se o Instituto, que funcionava legalmente com o apoio de órgãos federais e era fiscalizado pelo CONCEA (Conselho Nacional de Controle de Experimentação Animal), estava realizando maus-tratos ou não. Os vereadores da Câmara Municipal de São Roque (SP) instauraram uma Comissão Especial de Inquérito (CEI) para investigar as ações do Instituto Royal no município.

Em nota oficial, a Polícia Militar de São Paulo informou que não evitou a invasão porque “optou por evitar colocar em risco a integridade física das pessoas” porque o número de manifestantes, curiosos e ativistas aumentou rapidamente. Os inquéritos policiais sobre o caso foram transferidos de São Roque, município do interior paulista que sedia o instituto, para a Delegacia de Investigações Gerais (DIG) do município de Sorocaba. Segundo o delegado ditular do caso, os ativistas flagrados depredando o Instituto serão enquadrados na nova Lei de Associação Criminosa. Um dos inquéritos vai apurar também as denúncias de maus-tratos contra os animais – cães, coelhos e ratos – usados como cobaias em experimentos científicos. Serão ouvidos os diretores responsáveis pelo Instituto Royal, que já foram intimados.

Por sua vez, o Instituto Royal refutou as alegações de maus-tratos e definiu o resgate dos animais como um “ato de grave violência, com sérios prejuízos para a sociedade brasileira, pois dificulta o desenvolvimento de pesquisa científica no ramo da saúde”. A invasão, ainda segundo o Instituto, provocou a perda de pesquisas e de um patrimônio genético que levou mais de dez anos para ser reunido. Entre as pesquisas realizadas pelo Instituto estão testes para medicamentos coadjuvantes na cura do câncer, além de antibióticos e fitoterápicos da flora brasileira. O Instituto, porém, é acusado não só de maus-tratos como também de realizar testes de produtos cosméticos para empresas do setor.

Anvisa e a Lei Arouca

beagles1A legislação que trata do uso de animais para fins científicos e didáticos está sob análise da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa). A autarquia avalia se há lacunas referentes à fiscalização das pesquisas para produção de medicamentos e cosméticos que podem ter impacto no uso de cobaias. De acordo com a Anvisa, a legislação atual não especifica o órgão responsável pela fiscalização dos laboratórios de pesquisa em animais. No âmbito da agência reguladora, não há exigência expressa para o uso de animais em testes, mas é necessária a apresentação de dados que comprovem a segurança dos diversos produtos registrados na Anvisa.

As regras para o uso de animais em pesquisa são definidas pela Lei 11.794, batizada de Lei Arouca, e pelos comitês de ética em pesquisa com animais ligados ao Sistema de Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa. Por definição da Lei Arouca, as instituições que executam atividades com animais podem receber cinco tipos de punição, que vão da advertência e suspensão de financiamentos oficiais à interdição definitiva do laboratório. A multa pode variar entre R$ 5 mil e R$ 20 mil.

Responsável por regular as atividades científicas com animais, o Conselho Nacional de Controle de Experimentação Animal (Concea), ligado ao Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, determina, por meio de diretriz, que atividades científicas ou didáticas devem considerar a substituição do uso dos animais, a redução do número de cobaias usadas, além do refinamento de técnicas que permitam reduzir o impacto negativo sobre o bem-estar deles.

A diretriz também orienta os profissionais a escolher métodos humanitários para condução dos projeto e a avaliar os animais regularmente para observar evidências de dor ou estresse agudo no decorrer do projeto e a usar agentes tranquilizantes, analgésicos e anestésicos adequados para a espécie animal e para os objetivos científicos ou didáticos.

O ministro da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, Marco Antonio Raupp, condenou nesta quarta-feira (23/10), na Câmara dos Deputados, a invasão do Instituto Royal, em São Paulo, por ativistas de direitos dos animais. Para o ministro, o episódio, ocorrido na sexta-feira (18) passada, foi um “crime”. “Essa invasão é um crime. Foi feita à revelia da lei. Quando se discutiu a legislação, discutiu-se também a necessidade que a comunidade científica tem – tanto as agências públicas, as universidades como as empresas – de fazer testes com relação a novos medicamentos. Em todo o mundo é assim. Não é só no Brasil não.”

Só porque em todo mundo é assim – será que é mesmo ou é apenas no Brasil em que leis frouxas não punem quem mereça ser punido, ou  que leis ambíguas além de defender os culpados, servem também para condenar os inocentes? Assista esse documentário e tire suas próprias conclusões.

.

O Grupo Ativista Anonymous Brasil, através de seu site, divulgou um dossiê expondo os dados do Instituto Royal e de seu presidente, que faço questão de reproduzir aqui:

Dados da empresa:

Razão Social: INSTITUTO DE EDUCACAO PARA PESQUISA, DESENVOLVIMENTO E INOVACAO TECNOLOGICA – ROYAL
Nome Fantasia: INSTITUTO ROYAL
CNPJ: 07.196.513/0001-69
Porte: NAO INFORMADO
Data de abertura: 14/01/2005
Telefones:
(11) 4714-1040
(11) 4714-1949
(11) 5928-0550
(11) 5971-8270
(19) 3843-9590

Endereços:
R PROFESSOR ENEAS DE SIQUEIRA NETO, 340 JARDIM DAS IMBUIAS CEP 04829-300 SP – SAO PAULO
ROD RAPOSO TAVARES, S/N – KM 56 MAILASQUI CEP 18131-220 SP – SAO ROQUE

Perfil Empresarial Bens e Receita
Faixa de Funcionários: De 21 a 50
Faturamento Presumido: 7 – De 5.000.000,01 a 10.000.000,00
Proprietário: ROMEU PEREIRA DE SOUZA (Presidente)

Dados do proprietário do Instituto:

Nome: ROMEU PEREIRA DE SOUZA
CPF: 042.672.658-87
E-mail: rpsouza@terra.com.br
Sexo: MASCULINO
Data de nascimento: 03/08/1940 (73 ANOS)

Telefones:
(19) 3863-0451
(19) 3863-2031
(19) 3863-8646
(19) 99771-7439
(19) 99789-0287
(19) 99831-0776

Endereços:
R NATALIO BIANCHESSI, 169 – C A S CHACARA SANTA FE CEP 13975-005 SP – ITAPIRA
R EUCLIDES DA CUNHA, 31 NOVA ITAPIRA CEP 13974-270 SP – ITAPIRA

Faixa de renda presumida
A1 – Acima de R$ 10.000,00

Sr. Romeu Pereira de Souza, esse dedo é para o senhor e toda a diretoria do Instituto Royal:

foto

Porque cães da raça Beagle e 10 fatos que você precisa saber

beagles2

Os beagles são usados por serem uma raça dócil e por terem menos variações genéticas, o que torna os resultados dos testes mais exatos. Saiba mais:

1. Os beagles são uma raça padrão para pesquisas no mundo todo, pois são cães dóceis e de fácil manuseio. Muitos são criados especificamente para isso. Nos EUA, existe um grupo de proteção, o Beagles Freedom Project, que realiza resgates e luta para acabar com a prática. No site deles, há vários vídeos de libertações. Assustados, os peludos demoram a sair das gaiolas e a entender que estão livres.

2. Em 2008, foi criada a lei 11.794 (leia ela na íntegra aqui) que regulamenta os experimentos com animais no Brasil. Há parágrafos de interpretação bastante ampla. Se o Instituto Royal for considerado culpado das acusações de maus tratos, pode ser penalizado com: advertência; multa de 5 000 a 20 000 reais; interdição temporária; suspensão de financiamentos de fontes oficiais de crédito e fomento científico; ou, mais gravemente, interdição definitiva.

3. 80% das pesquisas com animais no mundo são realizadas com camundongos e ratos, mas também estão envolvidos macacos, cachorros e aves.

4. Calcula-se que 100 milhões de bichos por ano sejam usados em experimentos.

5. Esses testes custam, em média, 14 bilhões de dólares anualmente.

6. As pesquisas são usadas principalmente, nesta ordem, para: desenvolvimento de novas drogas, produção de vacinas, pesquisas relativas ao câncer e estudos de toxicidade.

7. Carol Romanini, do Beleza de Blog, publicou a lista do Peta (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) sobre empresas de cosmético que realizam ou não testes em animais (dá para lê-la aqui). O grupo brasileiro Pea (Projeto Esperança Animal) relacionou também algumas marcas brasileiras que não realizam esse tipo de experimento (veja aqui). Entre elas, aparecem Granado, Jequiti, Mahogany, Contém 1g, O Boticário…

8. O deputado estadual Feliciano Filho apresentou em 2012 um projeto de lei que restringe a utilização de animais em atividades de ensino no Estado de São Paulo, prática comum em várias universidades (leia a íntegra aqui).

9. O Instituto Royal é uma OSCIP (Organização da Sociedade Civil de Interesse Público), ou seja, recebe verba pública de instituições de fomento à pesquisa.

10. Estão rolando pelo menos dois abaixos-assinados na internet contra os testes no Instituto Royal, um da Avaaz e outro da Petição Pública. Existem também grupos que procuram por métodos alternativos ao uso de animais em pesquisa, como a Sociedade Brasileira de Métodos Alternativos à Experimentação Animal (SBMAlt).

Fonte desse texto: http://vejasp.abril.com.br/blogs/bichos/2013/10/beagles-instituto-royal-testes-animais/

Princess Leia Organa, I mean, Carrie Fisher is turning 57 today!

carrie-fisher

Carrie Frances Fisher (born October 21, 1956) is an American actress, novelist, screenwriter, and performance artist. She is best known for her portrayal of Princess Leia in the original Star Wars trilogy. She is also known for her bestselling novel Postcards from the Edge and screenplay for a film of the same name, as well as her autobiographical one-woman play, Wishful Drinking, and the non-fiction book she based on it. She is the daughter of actress Debbie Reynolds, step-daughter of Elizabeth Taylor, former wife of Paul Simon, and the list goes on. She already had Meryl Streep portray her in her semi-autobiographical film Postcards from the Edge 23 years ago.

carrie-1997

 carrie-mark

carrie-young-1

carrie-young-2

mark_hamill_harrison_ford_carrie_fisher

original-sw-cast

Happy B-Day, Leia! I love you and I’ll always love you. May the Force be with you. I’ll see you in Star Wars – Episode VI!

Enjoy the gallery.

leia-1

leia-2

leia-3

leia-4

leia-5

leia-6

leia-7

leia-8

leia-9

leia-10

leia-11

leia-12

leia-13

leia-14

leia-15

leia-16

leia-17

leia-18

leia-19

leia-20

leia-21

leia-22

leia-23

leia-24

leia-25

leia-26

leia-27